Great topic, thanks for writing it up and presenting so well.
Wonderful illustrations using the Bird and Miles clips.
I find the insight into your learning process back then particularly interesting.
Motherlode said:
This is clear. For example, I might play E -> F -> F# over D- G7 Cmaj7Now go to the piano and play ii-V I, in the key of [C] very slowly.
On the D-7, pick any note that sounds good to you.
On the G7, move it up (1/2) step.
And on on the Cmaj7, move up another (1/2) step.
Now, do I have the following correct?Now do it with two notes, then three, then four…
I might choose over D- the notes [E,G].
Then I would move the whole interval up a half step to [F,Ab] over the G7 chord.
And then, move on to [F#,A] over C Maj.
In other words, I'm asking if you are moving the intervals in parallel.
Then for three notes, we might have [E,G,A] -> [F,Ab,Bb] -> [F#AB]
I understand that this was a way to feel your way through the changes by ear.
I get it. It's an organizational principle that allows for a certain logical progression of melody, and leaves room for the player to listen for the results next to the harmony. It also allows for the freedom of full chromaticism and doesn't impose the template of the scale or stepwise/scalewise motion.You were playing the ii-V progression with the notes/phrases that only sounded good to your ear. You were not the least bit concerned with the piano player or his chords.