Standard major scale progessions
Moderators: bobappleton, sandywilliams
Forum rules
An open letter from Alice Russell. June 21, 2011, Brookline, Massachusetts. 1. DO NOT make insulting, mean spirited remarks about anyone or their work; there are a plethora of sites where you can rant unfettered. If you attack someone personally, your comments will be removed. You can post it, but I'm not paying for it. Go elsewhere, and let those artists who are actually interested in discussion and learning have the floor. 2. There will be NO posting of or links to copyrighted material without permission of the copyright owner. That's the law. And if you respect the work of people who make meaningful contributions, you should have no problem following this policy. 3. I appreciate many of the postings from so many of you. Please don't feel you have to spend your time "defending" the LCC to those who come here with the express purpose of disproving it. George worked for decades to disprove it himself; if you know his music, there's no question that it has gravity. And a final word: George was famous for his refusal to lower his standards in all areas of his life, no matter the cost. He twice refused concerts of his music at Lincoln Center Jazz because of their early position on what was authentically jazz. So save any speculation about the level of him as an artist and a man. The quotes on our websites were not written by George; they were written by critics/writers/scholars/fans over many years. Sincerely, Alice
An open letter from Alice Russell. June 21, 2011, Brookline, Massachusetts. 1. DO NOT make insulting, mean spirited remarks about anyone or their work; there are a plethora of sites where you can rant unfettered. If you attack someone personally, your comments will be removed. You can post it, but I'm not paying for it. Go elsewhere, and let those artists who are actually interested in discussion and learning have the floor. 2. There will be NO posting of or links to copyrighted material without permission of the copyright owner. That's the law. And if you respect the work of people who make meaningful contributions, you should have no problem following this policy. 3. I appreciate many of the postings from so many of you. Please don't feel you have to spend your time "defending" the LCC to those who come here with the express purpose of disproving it. George worked for decades to disprove it himself; if you know his music, there's no question that it has gravity. And a final word: George was famous for his refusal to lower his standards in all areas of his life, no matter the cost. He twice refused concerts of his music at Lincoln Center Jazz because of their early position on what was authentically jazz. So save any speculation about the level of him as an artist and a man. The quotes on our websites were not written by George; they were written by critics/writers/scholars/fans over many years. Sincerely, Alice
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:23 am
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Standard major scale progessions
Hello,
I've just started reading the LCCOTO, and right now my biggest question is:
How do I apply this to standards, or II,V7,I type tunes.
Do I do away with key centers?
For example a tune like Blue Moon, basically a I,VI,II,V tune in Eb;
If I were to play the changes totally inside(no altered chords)
Would I just think in terms of Ab Lydian as the Principal ?,(or Lydian Key)
Does this make sense?
Thanks,
Benny Weinbeck
(:?:)
I've just started reading the LCCOTO, and right now my biggest question is:
How do I apply this to standards, or II,V7,I type tunes.
Do I do away with key centers?
For example a tune like Blue Moon, basically a I,VI,II,V tune in Eb;
If I were to play the changes totally inside(no altered chords)
Would I just think in terms of Ab Lydian as the Principal ?,(or Lydian Key)
Does this make sense?
Thanks,
Benny Weinbeck
(:?:)
Re: Standard major scale progessions
You don't have to do away with key centers, but you have to think of them differently. You play F-, Bb-, Eb7 gravitate downward to the final Lydian Tonic, similar to the idea rxpressed on page eight of the LCCOTO. So the Concept really embraces the idea of having key centers in I VI II V progressions. The application of progressions like these are different though. Abmaj7 would be played with an Ab Lydian I chordmode alliance, F- with a Ab Lydian VI Chordmode Alliance, Bb- with a Db Lydian VI chordmode alliance, and Eb7 with a Db lydian chordmode alliance. The use of naming the chords diatonically represents a horizontal approach, and this volume deals with the vertical approach. Hope this helps?
Last edited by Andrew on Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:17 pm
In Benny’s Blue Moon in Eb example the chords are Eb, Cmi, Fmi, and Bb7. This is consistant for the [A] sections of the song. The bridge has brief visit to Gb. You can certainly play an Eb major scale ( a horizontal scale) over all but the brief Gb section. You may also improvise or write vertically over each one of the chords. This might open up some interesting melodic doors for you. You are free to change the quality of chords such as making it Eb7, C7, F7, Bb7. This would create more possibilities. How ‘bout writing a new tune based on Blue Moon!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:23 am
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Standard progressions
Thank you for your replies. They helped.
Does horizontal really mean based on the major scale? And vertical is based on the LCC scales, or does it go much deeper than that, and I need to absorb more of what I'm reading.
I really appreciate everyones help, I'm determined to understand and utilize this as far as I can. It has helped my improv already, and I really
am only scratching the surface. I hope that I can reach the point where I can help people understand it as well.
I've been using the horizontal approach for way too long.
I know, I know, "read the book". I am.
Thanks,
Benny Weinbeck
Does horizontal really mean based on the major scale? And vertical is based on the LCC scales, or does it go much deeper than that, and I need to absorb more of what I'm reading.
I really appreciate everyones help, I'm determined to understand and utilize this as far as I can. It has helped my improv already, and I really
am only scratching the surface. I hope that I can reach the point where I can help people understand it as well.
I've been using the horizontal approach for way too long.
I know, I know, "read the book". I am.
Thanks,
Benny Weinbeck
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:17 pm
Vertical, as in chords are vertical entities. You stack the notes from low to high 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 (in tertian harmony). Melodies can reflect vertical structures such as an arpeggio. The tools in Vol. I of the LCC give you the musical equivalent of the Crayola set with all the colors( you know, the one that comes with a crayon sharpener as opposed to the set with only seven colors!) for vertical thinking.
Horizontal, as in the melody to Sonnymoon for Two or Bag’s Groove is a blues scale (in the key of the respective tune). This blues scale may be played over a plethora of vertical entities and still retain its bluesy quality. Check out the melody to Stella by Starlight. The entire melody is except for one note is in the Bb major scale. Vol. II of the LCC promises to go into great detail about horizontal thinking.
PS: Should you want to explore the nature of improvising itself you might want to pick up Derek Bailey’s : Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music
http://www.amazon.com/Improvisation-Its ... 0306805286
You can read the reviews on Amazon.
Horizontal, as in the melody to Sonnymoon for Two or Bag’s Groove is a blues scale (in the key of the respective tune). This blues scale may be played over a plethora of vertical entities and still retain its bluesy quality. Check out the melody to Stella by Starlight. The entire melody is except for one note is in the Bb major scale. Vol. II of the LCC promises to go into great detail about horizontal thinking.
PS: Should you want to explore the nature of improvising itself you might want to pick up Derek Bailey’s : Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music
http://www.amazon.com/Improvisation-Its ... 0306805286
You can read the reviews on Amazon.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:23 am
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Standard progressions
Wow!
That's a great explanation. Thank you Sandy. I will definitely check out the book.
I now understand vertical and horizontal.
By the way does anyone have an idea of when vol. 2 will be published?
Maybe by then I'll have a better grasp of the concept.
Thanks again, you've really helped.
Benny Weinbeck
That's a great explanation. Thank you Sandy. I will definitely check out the book.
I now understand vertical and horizontal.
By the way does anyone have an idea of when vol. 2 will be published?
Maybe by then I'll have a better grasp of the concept.
Thanks again, you've really helped.
Benny Weinbeck
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:17 pm
One of the great myths about the LCC, perpetuated my folks with only the most cursory knowledge of it, is that the Concept says the Lydian scale is ‘better’ than the Major scale or supplants it. The fact is that the Lydian scale exists in a state of vertical tonal gravity and the Major scale in a horizontal state of tonal gravity.
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
I just want to echo and really applaud 2 of Sandy's comments here:
First the Derek Bailey book! It's one of the very few pieces of music literature dealing with the idea and breadth of improvisation as a concept. Also do check out Bailey's album Standards. People often find his music relatively "difficult". So it's amazing to hear his interpretations of standard melodies here. Like they say "imagination is more important than knowledge." I got my copy on emusic.
Secondly – what about his "One of the great myths about the LCC, perpetuated my folks with only the most cursory knowledge of it, is that the Concept says the Lydian scale is ‘better’ than the Major scale or supplants it. The fact is that the Lydian scale exists in a state of vertical tonal gravity and the Major scale in a horizontal state of tonal gravity." That's just so insightful man. Thank you.
And hey, theree was much more like from several people on the old "Forum". Maybe someone will find it one day.
First the Derek Bailey book! It's one of the very few pieces of music literature dealing with the idea and breadth of improvisation as a concept. Also do check out Bailey's album Standards. People often find his music relatively "difficult". So it's amazing to hear his interpretations of standard melodies here. Like they say "imagination is more important than knowledge." I got my copy on emusic.
Secondly – what about his "One of the great myths about the LCC, perpetuated my folks with only the most cursory knowledge of it, is that the Concept says the Lydian scale is ‘better’ than the Major scale or supplants it. The fact is that the Lydian scale exists in a state of vertical tonal gravity and the Major scale in a horizontal state of tonal gravity." That's just so insightful man. Thank you.
And hey, theree was much more like from several people on the old "Forum". Maybe someone will find it one day.
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Correction: The Derek Bailey album is called Ballads, not Standards. Oops.
http://www.amazon.com/Ballads-Derek-Bai ... B000063BUW
http://www.amazon.com/Ballads-Derek-Bai ... B000063BUW