motherlode mentioned an idea - quite a while ago - which he called "hearing absolute". he said at the time, that beboppers used to speak about the idea of "hearing absolute".
after his post, i asked my oldest jazz friend benny powell if he'd heard of this, while he was playing on the bebop scene in new york during the forties. i still find this idea compelling. it seems like this is what people did - who had the confidence to do so. and i'm attempting to open up our discussion to the idea that "not knowing" is more important than "knowing" - a statement that cage and einstein both made in different ways. and which was also made by anything charlie parker, ornette coleman, or charles mingus ever played.
and it seems to me that so much of george russell's music falls into this category as well. listening to the recent re-issue of the band from newport 1964 with john gilmore, it's really striking that no matter what concept drives the musical structure it never loses its freedom and its ability to soar in any direction at any time. and to anyone interested in how music developed after charlie parker, i can only recommend listening to this and hearing the astonishing variety of sounds - a language with it's own unique unspoken meaning.
b
hearing absolute
Moderators: bobappleton, sandywilliams
Forum rules
An open letter from Alice Russell. June 21, 2011, Brookline, Massachusetts. 1. DO NOT make insulting, mean spirited remarks about anyone or their work; there are a plethora of sites where you can rant unfettered. If you attack someone personally, your comments will be removed. You can post it, but I'm not paying for it. Go elsewhere, and let those artists who are actually interested in discussion and learning have the floor. 2. There will be NO posting of or links to copyrighted material without permission of the copyright owner. That's the law. And if you respect the work of people who make meaningful contributions, you should have no problem following this policy. 3. I appreciate many of the postings from so many of you. Please don't feel you have to spend your time "defending" the LCC to those who come here with the express purpose of disproving it. George worked for decades to disprove it himself; if you know his music, there's no question that it has gravity. And a final word: George was famous for his refusal to lower his standards in all areas of his life, no matter the cost. He twice refused concerts of his music at Lincoln Center Jazz because of their early position on what was authentically jazz. So save any speculation about the level of him as an artist and a man. The quotes on our websites were not written by George; they were written by critics/writers/scholars/fans over many years. Sincerely, Alice
An open letter from Alice Russell. June 21, 2011, Brookline, Massachusetts. 1. DO NOT make insulting, mean spirited remarks about anyone or their work; there are a plethora of sites where you can rant unfettered. If you attack someone personally, your comments will be removed. You can post it, but I'm not paying for it. Go elsewhere, and let those artists who are actually interested in discussion and learning have the floor. 2. There will be NO posting of or links to copyrighted material without permission of the copyright owner. That's the law. And if you respect the work of people who make meaningful contributions, you should have no problem following this policy. 3. I appreciate many of the postings from so many of you. Please don't feel you have to spend your time "defending" the LCC to those who come here with the express purpose of disproving it. George worked for decades to disprove it himself; if you know his music, there's no question that it has gravity. And a final word: George was famous for his refusal to lower his standards in all areas of his life, no matter the cost. He twice refused concerts of his music at Lincoln Center Jazz because of their early position on what was authentically jazz. So save any speculation about the level of him as an artist and a man. The quotes on our websites were not written by George; they were written by critics/writers/scholars/fans over many years. Sincerely, Alice
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:17 pm
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
thanks to dds1234!
i'm now doing a grad project on the judy lochhead piece. she creates a very interesting argument for placing music alongside art theory, literature, and science as a leading contributor to the development of chaos theories.
it's beautifully researched. and as an example of what one can do to create greater understanding and make a difference in the future of musicians inclined to the evolution of vocabularies - it's a testimony!
she stretches from schoenberg through cage and aacm to the grateful dead - weaving through time and across subjects.
highly recommended: judy lochhead "hearing chaos"
i'm now doing a grad project on the judy lochhead piece. she creates a very interesting argument for placing music alongside art theory, literature, and science as a leading contributor to the development of chaos theories.
it's beautifully researched. and as an example of what one can do to create greater understanding and make a difference in the future of musicians inclined to the evolution of vocabularies - it's a testimony!
she stretches from schoenberg through cage and aacm to the grateful dead - weaving through time and across subjects.
highly recommended: judy lochhead "hearing chaos"