Is that a sum of the pitch-frequencies?
What purpose does it serve?
Tnx
Search found 29 matches
- Thu Jun 16, 2016 3:48 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: Fmaj7-trigonometrics
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15313
- Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:40 am
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: Can we actually omit the fifth in a ladder?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 41210
Re: Can we actually omit the fifth in a ladder?
Здравствуй! IMHO the answer lies in the title: it's an artistic *concept*, not a completely scietifically based system. All those explanations (most of which involve mention of harmonics), are problematic, not just for myself (may I suggest the book by James Beament). A true scientific explanation o...
- Sat Jan 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15617
Re: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
All the best to everyone!
m
m
- Wed Sep 23, 2015 11:24 pm
- Forum: Lydiotics (New Developments in the LCC)
- Topic: A (mathematical) Tonal Gravity Demonstration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 11379
Re: A (mathematical) Tonal Gravity Demonstration
It is two different things I beleive.
Haven't seen Isaac's work,
but regarding Jeff Brent's web page - don't worry,
it's completely insignificant stuff.
Haven't seen Isaac's work,
but regarding Jeff Brent's web page - don't worry,
it's completely insignificant stuff.
- Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:47 pm
- Forum: Lydiocy (LCC Theory Discussion)
- Topic: Best edition to start?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16738
Re: Best edition to start?
I first studied the 4th ed then got the 1st too.
FWIW I much prefer the 1st ed, for my brain it was easier, more clear and faster...
FWIW I much prefer the 1st ed, for my brain it was easier, more clear and faster...
- Sun Sep 06, 2015 3:31 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
I hear this as Gmaj7b5/Db Probably just a typo isn't it? His voicing: Db11(b5) voiced as Db g b Eb Gb. would corespond to GMaj7 # 5/Db, that is just how I took it... @Salkur I don't know why ML said that, but I agree with you about that voicing not being ambiguous. But who knows, a single word can ...
- Sun Sep 06, 2015 12:42 am
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
Well, I found this post: http://forums.allaboutjazz.com/showthread.php?61006-Equal-Division-of-the-Octave-(EDO)&p=663792&viewfull=1#post663792 The whole discussion there is a bit too complex for me at the moment, so I didn't follow the whole story. But as an experiment this morning I took a ...
- Fri Sep 04, 2015 11:03 am
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
Interesting! I miss ML and his insights here. I'll search for the discussion at AAJ...
- Thu Sep 03, 2015 2:30 am
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
Been listening and playing with it a little, here is order of preference for my ears (for stated voicing of 11b5): definitely primarily at home as II, excellent (secondary use) as VI or III, getting borderline as +IV, VII or V on the other hand less good @bII a bit harsh in other roles (I, IV, bVII,...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:20 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
For me 7#5 primarily belongs to group III, not +V. I see it is possible to use any chord in any possible way and in different contexts, but when talking about it's sole primary character that is how I hear and see it. Chords that I'd call ambiguous are: aug (no seventh), dim and 7b5. But maybe I hav...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 1:20 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: parent scales and ambiguous chords
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62241
Re: parent scales and ambiguous chords
Hi!
This is how I currently see these tonesets:
11(b5)
primairly belongs to group II, and is quite similar in its nature to 11 voiced without the 5th
7#9#5
primarily belongs to group III
9b5
primarily belongs to group II
Check yourself, and let me know if you disagree.
All the best,
m
This is how I currently see these tonesets:
11(b5)
primairly belongs to group II, and is quite similar in its nature to 11 voiced without the 5th
7#9#5
primarily belongs to group III
9b5
primarily belongs to group II
Check yourself, and let me know if you disagree.
All the best,
m
- Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:44 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: Sad...
- Replies: 4
- Views: 19740
Re: Sad...
I agree, but what to do...?
- Tue May 05, 2015 12:43 pm
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: About new scales.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 22815
Re: About new scales.
Hi Fer!
The more I look into tonal gravity / lcc, the more I feel and beleive that scales are not important at all. You choose whatever set of tones you want, and tonal gravity tells you how far from any chosen tonal center that set is...
The more I look into tonal gravity / lcc, the more I feel and beleive that scales are not important at all. You choose whatever set of tones you want, and tonal gravity tells you how far from any chosen tonal center that set is...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:57 am
- Forum: Lydiation (LCC General Discussion)
- Topic: Forum Categories in progress
- Replies: 7
- Views: 32041
Re: Forum Categories in progress
At first I wasn't so crazy about this, but now having seen it labeled on screen it really does look fun!!
And everything about music and all art should be fun in some way, even when it's serious
All the best,
m
And everything about music and all art should be fun in some way, even when it's serious
All the best,
m
- Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:58 pm
- Forum: Lydiocy (LCC Theory Discussion)
- Topic: LCC Non-functional Analysis
- Replies: 0
- Views: 21004
Re: LCC Non-functional Analysis
Thanks for sharing! Looks like a very useful procedure.
Though I note that once upon a time when composer wrote Db, that really meant Db / not C#...
I'd be interested in how meticulous George Russell was about this...
Though I note that once upon a time when composer wrote Db, that really meant Db / not C#...
I'd be interested in how meticulous George Russell was about this...